Category: Research and Discovery

  • Chronic stress may be quietly reshaping your heart

    Chronic stress may be quietly reshaping your heart

    Chronic stress linked to everyday life may leave a lasting physical mark on the heart, potentially damaging cardiovascular health and shortening lifespan.

    That conclusion comes from a study of nearly half a million adults in the UK, led by researchers at the MRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS) and Imperial College London. The researchers believe it is the largest study of its kind.

    Their findings suggest that chronic inflammation, which is associated with lifestyle and socioeconomic circumstances, may contribute to harmful changes in the heart’s structure. It was also linked to a greater risk of heart attack and stroke.

    Importantly, these changes may begin years before a person notices any cardiovascular symptoms, allowing the damage to build silently over time.

    Hidden Inflammation May Change the Heart

    Professor Declan O’Regan, British Heart Foundation Chair of Cardiovascular AI at Imperial College London and Head of the Computational Cardiac Imaging Group at the LMS, said: “Our study, which is the largest of its kind, suggests that millions of people could be living with hidden inflammation, which is slowly changing their heart and causing long-term damage – increasing the risk of heart attack and stroke. Chronic inflammation is complicated, but we know it’s tied to our health and driven by a range of lifestyle and economic factors – meaning people may be at more risk just because of their surroundings, their economic status, their family’s health and their lifestyle.”

    “But while tackling health inequalities remains an issue, there are things that we can do about inflammation, including reducing risk factors like smoking and obesity.”

    Chronic inflammation occurs when the immune system remains mildly activated for long periods rather than switching off after an immediate threat has passed. This persistent, low-level immune activity has been associated with several diseases, including cancer and diabetes, and researchers increasingly suspect that it may also play an important role in heart disease.

    For the new study, the team examined UK Biobank data from nearly 480,000 adults in the UK. They assessed inflammation using a blood marker called glycoprotein acetyls (GlycA) and combined those measurements with heart imaging and genetic information.

    A 43% Higher Risk of Heart Attack and Stroke

    People with the highest inflammation levels (the top 20%) had a 43% higher risk of heart attack and stroke than participants with the lowest levels (the bottom 20%).

    The researchers also found signs that inflammation was associated with physical remodeling of the heart. People with higher inflammation tended to have thicker heart walls, smaller heart chambers and poorer heart filling – all changes which may develop quietly for years before progressing to heart failure.

    Inflammation was also strongly associated with socioeconomic disadvantage and psychological distress. More familiar cardiovascular risk factors, including smoking and excess body fat, were linked to higher inflammation as well.

    People whose inflammation remained elevated over time had a 43% greater risk of heart attack and stroke, even when they had no previously existing heart disease.

    The findings suggest that inflammation may provide one biological route through which pressures from everyday life, including poverty and mental health problems, can affect the body and increase cardiovascular risk.

    Social Factors, Mental Health, and Genetics

    Professor Declan O’Regan added, “The surprising thing was how much social factors and mental health are linked to inflammation and damage to the heart — as well as more well-known risk factors like smoking and inactivity. There was also a strong genetic factor, with some people being naturally more resilient or susceptible to the inflammatory damage that comes from different lifestyles.”

    The researchers emphasize, however, that genetic susceptibility or difficult life circumstances do not make heart disease inevitable. There are still opportunities to reduce persistent inflammation and lower cardiovascular risk.

    The analysis also highlighted inflammatory proteins in the interleukin-1 and TNF families as possible contributors to the observed heart damage.

    Several of these proteins are already being targeted by drugs being tested in clinical trials. That raises the possibility that anti-inflammatory therapies could eventually help prevent cardiovascular disease before symptoms begin.

    Blood Tests Could Help Identify People at Risk

    The researchers also suggest that inflammation blood tests could potentially be combined with genetic risk scores to identify people who may benefit most from early intervention.

    Professor Bryan Williams, Chief Scientific and Medical Officer at the British Heart Foundation, said: “Inflammation is part of the body’s healing process, but there is also a darker side to it. This large-scale study found people with higher levels of inflammation experienced silent changes to the structure of their hearts and had a higher risk of major cardiac events including heart attacks and strokes.”

    “The research provides valuable insights into how our genes and lifestyle factors, such as smoking, poor mental health and socioeconomic status, can converge to trigger inflammation. It also identifies several inflammatory proteins that appear to play a key role in the heart changes linked to chronic inflammation, and it is to be hoped that anti-inflammatory medicines could become an important tool in preventing cardiovascular disease.

    “These findings reinforce the importance of tackling the causes of inflammation and poor cardiovascular health, while also supporting people to make lifestyle changes that can help protect their hearts.”

    The study was funded by the Medical Research Council and British Heart Foundation.

    The work was also supported by the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, a translational research partnership between Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College London.

  • Scientists solve a 50-year mystery and discover a new human blood group

    Scientists solve a 50-year mystery and discover a new human blood group

    More than half a century after scientists first encountered a mysterious marker on human red blood cells, researchers finally traced it to its genetic source. The breakthrough established MAL as a human blood group system and gave doctors a new way to identify the exceptionally rare people whose blood lacks the AnWj antigen.

    The work was led by scientists at NHS Blood and Transplant in Bristol, including researchers from the International Blood Group Reference Laboratory (IBGRL), together with colleagues at the University of Bristol. Their findings solved a puzzle dating back to 1972 and could help prevent dangerous transfusion reactions in a small number of patients.

    Although most people are familiar with the ABO and Rh blood groups, those are only part of a much larger biological system. Red blood cells carry hundreds of different molecules on their surfaces. Many of these molecules act as antigens, markers that the immune system can recognize.

    For most transfusions, ABO and Rh compatibility receive the most attention. But in patients with unusual antibodies or rare blood types, matching some of these lesser-known antigens can become crucial.

    A Blood Marker Found in More Than 99.9% of People

    The AnWj antigen was discovered in 1972, but for decades scientists did not know which gene produced it or which protein carried it on red blood cells.[1]

    More than 99.9% of people are AnWj positive. For the tiny minority who are AnWj negative, however, the distinction can matter enormously.

    If an AnWj negative person develops antibodies against AnWj and then receives AnWj positive blood, those antibodies can attack the transfused red blood cells. In some circumstances, that can trigger a potentially serious transfusion reaction.

    There are also two very different reasons someone can lack the antigen. In most cases, AnWj expression appears to be suppressed because of an underlying hematological disorder or certain cancers.[2] Much more rarely, a person is born without the antigen because of an inherited genetic change.

    Only a handful of people with this inherited form had ever been identified, making the mystery especially difficult to investigate.

    The Genetic Clue Was Hidden in MAL

    To find the source, the researchers turned to whole exome sequencing. This technique examines the portions of DNA that contain instructions for making proteins, allowing scientists to search across thousands of genes for unusual variants shared by affected individuals.

    The analysis pointed unexpectedly to the MAL gene.

    The researchers found that people with the inherited AnWj negative phenotype carried homozygous deletions affecting MAL. Homozygous means that the relevant change was present in both copies of the gene, one inherited from each parent.

    The MAL gene produces a small membrane protein called Mal. When the team examined red blood cells, people who were AnWj positive produced the full-length Mal protein on their cells, while it was missing from AnWj negative cells.

    Five genetically AnWj negative individuals were included in the investigation, including members of an Arab Israeli family.[3] The samples also included blood donated in 2015 by the woman who had been the first AnWj negative person identified in the 1970s.

    The researchers did not stop at finding a genetic association. They needed to demonstrate that Mal really was responsible for the antigen.

    When scientists introduced the normal MAL gene into laboratory cells, the cells became reactive with AnWj antibodies. Introducing the altered form did not produce the same response. Additional experiments showed that Mal was both necessary and sufficient for expression of the AnWj antigen.

    MAL Becomes an Official Blood Group System

    Those results provided the evidence needed to establish MAL as a distinct blood group system, with AnWj as its defining antigen.

    The International Society of Blood Transfusion later formally reported MAL as ISBT 047. MAL was one of four blood group systems ratified during the period covered by the organization’s 2026 terminology report, alongside ER, CD36 and ATP11C.

    That designation is more significant than simply adding another name to a list. For something to qualify as a blood group system, researchers must connect an antigen to a defined genetic and molecular basis.

    MAL was the 47th officially recognized blood group system at the time. The field has continued to move quickly since then. In September 2026, the International Society of Blood Transfusion announced JAMA as the 49th blood group system, illustrating how the genetic map of human blood is still being expanded.

    Why the Discovery Matters for Transfusions

    Knowing the gene behind AnWj gives blood specialists something they did not previously have: a direct genetic way to search for people who inherit AnWj-negative blood.

    Genotyping tests can now be designed to identify rare patients and donors carrying the relevant MAL changes. These tests can potentially be incorporated into existing blood group genotyping systems.

    That matters because finding compatible blood for someone with an antibody against a marker present in more than 99.9% of people can be extraordinarily difficult.

    The need is not merely theoretical. Earlier clinical reports have shown that anti-AnWj antibodies can cause hemolytic transfusion reactions, in which transfused red blood cells are destroyed by the recipient’s immune system.

    More recent cases have underscored just how complicated the situation can become.

    In 2026, researchers reported a 75-year-old man with severe anemia and an anti-AnWj autoantibody. Compatible blood was unavailable, so physicians ultimately transfused unmatched red blood cells after weighing the risks. Genetic testing showed that his MAL gene was normal, supporting the conclusion that his antibody was acquired rather than caused by the rare inherited MAL deficiency. He did not experience a hemolytic transfusion reaction in that case.

    Another 2026 case involved a patient with high-grade B-cell lymphoma and a complement-binding anti-ANWj autoantibody. After incompatible transfusions were followed by signs of red blood cell destruction, clinicians used sutimlimab, a drug that blocks part of the immune complement pathway. The patient’s laboratory measurements improved, although the researchers stressed that the complicated case and short treatment period prevent firm conclusions about the treatment’s effectiveness. It was reported as the first use of sutimlimab for this particular type of anti-AnWj-associated hemolysis.

    Together, these cases highlight an important distinction. Some people are AnWj negative because of inherited MAL changes, while others can lose AnWj expression because of disease and develop an antibody against a marker their cells previously carried.

    A Mystery That Took Decades to Crack

    Louise Tilley, Senior Research Scientist, IBGRL Red Cell Reference at NHS Blood and Transplant, said: “The genetic background of AnWj has been a mystery for more than 50 years, and one which I personally have been trying to resolve for almost 20 years of my career. It represents a huge achievement, and the culmination of a long team effort, to finally establish this new blood group system and be able to offer the best care to rare, but important, patients.

    “The work was difficult because the genetic cases are very rare. We would not have achieved this without exome sequencing, as the gene we identified wasn’t an obvious candidate and little is known about Mal protein in red cells. Proving our findings was challenging, and we appreciate the help of all our collaborators, and the patients, without whom we would not have got to this point.”

    One reason the mystery endured for so long was simply the rarity of inherited AnWj negative blood. With so few known cases, researchers had very little genetic material from affected people to compare.

    The Mal protein itself also offered few obvious clues. It is a very small protein embedded in cell membranes and has been associated with processes involving membrane organization and cellular transport. Nothing immediately pointed to it as the carrier of a long mysterious red blood cell antigen.

    Gene Editing Helped Confirm the Answer

    Ash Toye, Professor of Cell Biology in the School of Biochemistry and Director of the NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in red cell products at the University of Bristol, said: “It’s really exciting we were able use our ability to manipulate gene expression in the developing blood cells to help confirm the identity of the AnWj blood group, which has been an outstanding puzzle for half a century. This development will help identify these rare donors and help patients in the future.”

    Manipulating gene expression allowed the researchers to test cause and effect rather than simply observe that a genetic variant happened to occur in AnWj negative people. By changing which genes cells expressed and then testing whether AnWj appeared, the scientists could build a much stronger case that MAL was the missing piece.

    Nicole Thornton, Head of IBGRL Red Cell Reference at NHS Blood and Transplant, said: “Resolving the genetic basis for AnWj has been one of our most challenging projects.

    “There is so much work that goes into proving that a gene does actually encode a blood group antigen, but it is what we are passionate about, making these discoveries for the benefit of rare patients around the world.

    “Now genotyping tests can be designed to identify genetically AnWj-negative patients and donors. Such tests can be added to the existing genotyping platforms.”

    The official ISBT blood group database now lists the reference MAL allele along with the null allele associated with the AnWj negative phenotype, turning what was once an unexplained serological curiosity into a genetically defined blood group system.

    Human Blood Is Far More Complicated Than ABO

    The MAL story also illustrates how much complexity is hidden behind the familiar letters A, B, AB and O.

    Blood groups are defined by inherited differences in molecules on red blood cells. These differences often have little noticeable effect in everyday life. They become important when the immune system encounters red blood cells carrying an antigen it recognizes as foreign, particularly during transfusion or pregnancy.

    That is why rare blood group research can have an outsized clinical impact despite involving very few people. If a patient has an antibody against an antigen carried by nearly everyone else, locating compatible donor blood can require specialized laboratories, rare donor registries and sometimes international cooperation.

    Dr. Tim Satchwell, Senior Lecturer at UWE Bristol, who contributed to the study whilst a Research Fellow at the University of Bristol, said: “Mal is a very small protein with some interesting properties which made it difficult to identify and meant we needed to pursue multiple lines of investigation to accumulate the proof we needed to establish this blood group system. Being able to combine our expertise to finally achieve this has brought the whole team a lot of satisfaction.”

    For more than 50 years, AnWj was a blood antigen without a known genetic home. The identification of MAL changed that, giving researchers a molecular explanation, clinicians a path toward better genetic testing, and rare patients a better chance of being identified before a difficult transfusion becomes an emergency.

    Notes

    • Blood groups are complex. The two best known blood group systems are ABO and Rh. Within each blood group, red cells can carry surface markers called antigens. For example, within the ABO blood group system, there are the A and B antigens – people with A have the A antigen, people with B have the B antigen, people with AB blood have both and people with O have neither. There are now 47 recognized blood group systems together containing more than 360 recognized blood antigens.
    • AnWj is named after the first people who made the antibody (Anton and Wj).
    • The disorders suppress Mal and make patients AnWj-negative, unless they have the rare inherited form (MAL deletion). The inherited AnWj-negative people are healthy.
  • These blood thinners may have an unexpected benefit for Alzheimer’s patients

    These blood thinners may have an unexpected benefit for Alzheimer’s patients

    People who have both atrial fibrillation and Alzheimer’s disease may experience slower cognitive decline when treated with newer NOAC blood thinners, according to research from Karolinska Institutet published in the European Heart Journal.

    Atrial fibrillation is a common heart rhythm condition in older adults and also affects many people living with Alzheimer’s disease. Doctors often prescribe blood thinners to these patients to reduce the chance of blood clots and stroke. Earlier research has suggested that anticoagulant treatment may lower the risk of developing dementia, but far less is known about whether these drugs influence cognitive decline after Alzheimer’s disease has already been diagnosed.

    “There are reasons to believe that the treatment could have a positive effect on cognition, for example by improving blood flow and reducing small-scale damage in the brain,” says Maria Eriksdotter, professor at the Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, and senior consultant in geriatric medicine at Karolinska University Hospital, who led the study.

    Comparing Newer and Older Blood Thinners

    Researchers analyzed information from SveDem (Swedish Register for Cognitive Disorders/Dementia), a national quality registry, and included 7,308 people diagnosed with both atrial fibrillation and Alzheimer’s disease.

    Participants were placed into three matched groups. One group received newer anticoagulants known as NOACs, another was treated with the older blood thinner warfarin (Waran), and the third did not receive any anticoagulant medication.

    To track changes in thinking and memory over time, researchers used the standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

    Slower Cognitive Decline With NOACs

    People taking NOACs showed a significantly slower decline in cognitive function than those treated with warfarin or those who received no anticoagulant medication.

    The difference amounted to slightly more than 0.2 MMSE points per year. While that change is relatively small over a single year, the researchers say it could become more meaningful if it continues over a longer period.

    “The difference is modest for an individual patient from one year to the next, but over a longer period even such an effect could influence how cognitive function develops. Our findings suggest that NOAC treatment may also be significant for cognition in this patient group,” says Nanbo Zhu, researcher at the Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet.

    Lower Risks of Stroke and Other Complications

    The potential benefits were not limited to cognition. Compared with people who did not receive anticoagulants, those treated with NOACs also had lower risks of death, stroke, blood clots and fractures.

    Warfarin was also associated with lower risks of death, stroke, and blood clots. However, people taking warfarin had a higher risk of major bleeding.

    Why the Findings Need Caution

    The researchers emphasize that the study has important limitations. Because it was observational, the results cannot prove that NOACs directly caused the slower cognitive decline or the other health benefits seen in the data.

    Some factors that could affect both which treatment a patient received and how their health changed over time could not be fully evaluated. The researchers also note that some participants may have switched from one medication to another during the follow-up period.

    The study was funded by, amongst others, the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Brain Foundation, CIMED, ALF project funding and Karolinska Institutet funds. Maria Eriksdotter has participated as a consultant in one-off meetings with BioArctic AB, Roche, Eli Lilly, Biogen/Eisai and Novo Nordisk, and has given lectures at symposia sponsored by Roche and BioArctic/Eisai. No other conflicts of interest are reported.

  • New mesothelioma drug turns cancer’s own defenses against it

    New mesothelioma drug turns cancer’s own defenses against it

    Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive cancer that is most often linked to asbestos exposure. When asbestos fibers are inhaled, they can become trapped in the lungs, where they trigger chronic inflammation that may eventually lead to cancer decades later.

    About 30,000 people worldwide are diagnosed with mesothelioma every year. Treatment options remain limited. Immunotherapy and chemotherapy can help some patients, but the disease is still extremely difficult to control. Patients, many of whom are men who previously worked in industries such as shipbuilding, oil refining, and asbestos manufacturing, have a median survival of about 12 months. The five year survival rate is approximately 10 percent.

    “It’s a disease of a significant unmet medical need,” says Brian Cunniff, a professor at the University of Vermont.

    Now, research published in Nature Communications by Cunniff, UVM research scientist Victoria Gibson, and an international team of collaborators describes an unusual strategy that could offer a new way to treat mesothelioma and potentially other forms of cancer.

    In a phase one clinical trial sponsored by RS Oncology, LLC, patients with relapsed mesothelioma received an experimental drug that controlled disease progression in 67% of participants. Tumors also shrank in some patients. The drug was generally well tolerated, and the critically ill patients in the trial lived longer than patients receiving standard treatments.

    Turning Cancer’s Protective System Into a Weakness

    Mesothelioma cells, like many cancer cells, produce unusually high levels of “reactive oxygen species,” unstable molecules that can damage cells. These molecules are generated in part because tumor cells have highly active metabolisms.

    To survive that stressful environment, cancer cells increase production of antioxidant enzymes that help neutralize the damaging molecules. One of those enzymes is peroxiredoxin 3, or PRX3, which operates inside mitochondria, the structures that produce much of a cell’s energy.

    The UVM researchers decided to reverse the usual logic behind antioxidant-based cancer strategies.

    For years, scientists tested whether increasing antioxidants could help fight cancer by reducing reactive oxygen species. Many of those clinical trials failed, and some research suggested that boosting antioxidants could actually help tumors grow.

    The UVM team instead asked what would happen if cancer cells were deprived of one of their most important antioxidant defenses.

    Their approach focuses on blocking PRX3. Without this protective enzyme, oxidative stress builds inside tumor cells until the damage becomes overwhelming.

    An Antibiotic That Overloads Tumor Cells

    The experimental treatment developed by RS Oncology grew out of discoveries made at UVM. It uses thiostrepton, a naturally occurring antibiotic, to disable PRX3.

    Blocking the enzyme causes hydrogen peroxide to accumulate inside the mitochondria of tumor cells, eventually triggering cell death.

    Cancer cells may be particularly vulnerable to this strategy because they already produce more reactive oxygen species than normal cells. PRX3 also turns over more rapidly in tumor cells, potentially allowing the treatment to target cancer more selectively while having less effect on healthy tissue.

    Laboratory experiments provided further evidence that PRX3 is important for mesothelioma survival.

    When researchers completely deleted PRX3 from mesothelioma tumor cell lines, mitochondrial function declined, cell growth slowed sharply, and the cancer cells could no longer form tumors in animal experiments.

    Other research groups have also shown that eliminating PRX3 in healthy mice does not produce adverse effects. That finding is important because mitochondria perform essential functions in nearly every cell, leading some scientists to question whether they can be safely targeted.

    “People will come up to us at conferences and state that you can’t target the mitochondria because they’re too important,” said Gibson. “The evidence — that you can knock out PRX3 in mice and there’s no adverse phenotype — supports our approach.”

    In other words, researchers have shown that mice can develop and function normally even when the genes responsible for producing PRX3 are removed.

    From a UVM Laboratory to Human Patients

    The scientific groundwork for the treatment began at UVM’s Cancer Center around 2015.

    After early experiments with thiostrepton produced encouraging results, researchers helped establish RS Oncology, a private pharmaceutical company created to move the UVM discoveries toward clinical testing. Brian Cunniff, an associate professor in the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at the university’s Larner College of Medicine, serves as the company’s chief science officer.

    The team eventually transformed thiostrepton into a clinical formulation called RSO-021.

    Between 2022 and 2023, researchers tested RSO-021 in a phase one clinical trial in the United Kingdom. The study was conducted under the oversight of the MHRA, the UK equivalent of the FDA.

    The treatment is delivered directly into the chest through a catheter that many mesothelioma patients already have in place because of “pleural effusions,” a buildup of fluid in the space between the lung and chest wall.

    Approximately 90 percent of mesothelioma patients develop pleural effusions.

    Delivering the drug locally allows doctors to concentrate it near the tumor while reducing the amount of medication circulating throughout the rest of the body.

    Early Trial Shows Encouraging Survival Results

    The phase one study met its safety and tolerability goals at a dose of 90 milligrams, and no patient deaths were attributed to the drug.

    Researchers also found evidence in patient tissue that RSO-021 was hitting its intended biological target. That result confirmed that the mechanism previously observed in cells and mice was also occurring in human tumors.

    Average progression-free survival was 4.2 months, roughly comparable to existing treatments.

    The researchers were more encouraged by overall survival. Among the 15 patients in the cohort, survival was better than what is typically seen with currently available therapies. Cunniff described the finding as a potential “game changer.”

    “Our overall survival data is very promising and will hopefully persist with additional patients,” Cunniff said.

    The findings also suggest that RSO-021 may do more than directly kill cancer cells. It may also alter the immune environment around the tumor in a way that helps the immune system attack or restrain the cancer.

    “Our drug has both cytotoxic activity, it can kill the tumor cells, but it also has immunomodulatory capacity where it can modulate the immune system to now manage the tumor,” said Cunniff.

    Phase two of the clinical trial has now been completed. The researchers expect to present the results at a global oncology meeting this year.

    Expanding the Strategy Beyond Mesothelioma

    The research is now moving in several directions.

    Scientists from UVM and RS Oncology, working with the University of Leicester and other institutions in the UK, are developing second-generation PRX3 inhibitors with improved solubility.

    Future versions could potentially be taken as an oral tablet, which could make the treatment easier to administer and potentially broaden its use beyond mesothelioma.

    At UVM, Gibson, the lead author of the new study, is continuing the work as a postdoctoral researcher. She is helping launch research investigating thiostrepton in peritoneal malignancies, including mesothelioma, gastric cancer, and other gastrointestinal cancers.

    That work is being conducted in collaboration with Conor O’Neill, a surgical oncologist at the UVM Cancer Center and UVM Health.

    “We believe this mechanism could be applicable to other cancers,” Cunniff said.

    For Gibson, seeing the research move from laboratory experiments into human trials has given the project a deeply personal dimension.

    “I’ve always just had a desire to help people because I feel like everyone has experienced cancer in their life, whether it’s them, friends, or family members,” she said.

    Even so, she was surprised when a family member contacted the laboratory hoping to enroll her dying father in the clinical trial.

    “We just work in a lab all day working with cells,” she recalled, “and the fact that we’re making an impact on people, that they’re wanting to be on this clinical trial, just was amazing to me.”

  • Scientists find a hidden cause of high blood pressure that routine tests can miss

    Scientists find a hidden cause of high blood pressure that routine tests can miss

    A common and frequently missed cause of high blood pressure may be easier to detect with help from a wearable device that tracks hormone changes throughout the day and night.

    New research published in Science Translational Medicine focuses on primary aldosteronism, a hormone disorder that may affect up to one in five people with high blood pressure. The condition is associated with an increased risk of heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and other serious health problems.

    Researchers from the University of Bristol and the University of Manchester in the UK, the University of Bergen in Norway, and collaborators in Stockholm and Athens found that people with primary aldosteronism can experience bursts of hormone production both during the day and while asleep at night. Those nighttime surges are especially important because routine blood tests are rarely performed during sleep.

    A Wearable Device Tracks Hormones Around the Clock

    To capture these hidden changes, the research team used a portable device developed at the University of Bristol that allowed patients to have their hormone levels monitored continuously while living normally at home rather than staying in a hospital or research facility.

    This type of continuous monitoring could reveal abnormalities that may be missed by conventional testing, potentially helping doctors identify hormone-related conditions earlier.

    Study co-lead author Dr. Thomas Upton, Clinical Research Fellow in Automated Sampling Clinical Fellow at the University of Bristol, and Senior Clinical Fellow at Bristol Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust said: “Primary aldosteronism is an important cause of high blood pressure and the most common cause of secondary hypertension we see in our blood pressure clinic. It could be affecting millions of people in the UK. However, due to the way hormones change during the day and the current complexity of the diagnostic process, diagnosis is often delayed or never made at all.

    “In our study, patients were monitored at home during normal activity, and this allowed us to see how hormones changed over time in realistic settings. This approach could potentially revolutionize how we diagnose hypertension and ultimately reduce cardiovascular disease – particularly heart disease and strokes – that could have been prevented.”

    Measuring Hormones Every 20 Minutes

    The proof-of-concept study followed 60 patients in Bristol, Bergen, Stockholm, and Athens over a 24-hour period. Hormone levels were measured every 20 minutes using a lightweight wearable device about the size of a mobile phone that attaches at the waist.

    Because the device samples hormones from the skin, participants were able to continue with their usual activities, including sleeping at night, while researchers collected detailed hormone data.

    The technology, known as U-RHYTHM, was adopted and further developed by the spinout company Dynamic Therapeutics in 2023.

    Study senior author Dr. Eder Zavala, UKRI Future Leader Fellow at the University of Manchester, said: “By continuously monitoring hormones over 24 hours, we were able to reveal a previously hidden pattern of nocturnal hormone bursts. This gives us a much clearer understanding of the disease and could ultimately help doctors detect it earlier and treat patients more effectively.

    “A more detailed mathematical and computational analysis of daily hormonal profiles could eventually also help uncover earlier and more subtle forms of the disease, opening new opportunities to improve outcomes for patients living with high blood pressure.”

    Why Standard Blood Tests May Miss the Disorder

    Researchers used computational analysis to study changes in aldosterone, a hormone that helps control salt and water balance in the body. They also tracked two closely related hormones, 18-hydroxycortisol and 18-oxocortisol.

    The results suggest that current diagnostic approaches may miss some patients because aldosterone does not remain consistently elevated.

    Even in some of the most severe cases, hormone levels sometimes dropped below the minimum thresholds typically used to diagnose primary aldosteronism. A single blood test taken at one moment could therefore capture a period when hormone levels appear relatively normal.

    Instead of remaining constantly high, aldosterone showed repeated bursts of secretion at night while the overall day-night rhythm of hormone activity remained intact.

    Nighttime Hormone Bursts Offer a New Clue

    The hormone spikes came from the adrenal glands and were especially pronounced in patients whose primary aldosteronism was caused by a problem affecting only one adrenal gland rather than both.

    Importantly, the unusual hormone patterns disappeared after the affected adrenal gland was surgically removed. That finding provided additional evidence that the bursts were directly associated with the disease.

    Study co-author Prof Stafford Lightman, Professor of Medicine at the University of Bristol and inventor of the U-RHYTHM technology, added: “The findings suggest that clinicians may need to rethink how they look for the disorder, which the Endocrine Society clinical practice guidelines now recommend should be considered for all people with hypertension, also known as high blood pressure.

    “Future diagnosis could move away from single time point blood tests and towards tracking the body’s hormone rhythms over time, particularly the overnight patterns that appear to hold crucial clues to disease. Further research is needed to define the best clinical pathways, using dynamic hormone measurement, to ensure early diagnosis of this common and potentially curable cause of high blood pressure.”

    Toward Earlier Detection of High Blood Pressure Causes

    The findings raise the possibility that future testing for primary aldosteronism could rely less on a single blood sample and more on monitoring how hormones change over time.

    Because the disorder can be treated and, in some cases, potentially cured, detecting it earlier could help reduce the risk of preventable cardiovascular complications.

    The research was funded by EU Horizon 2020, the Trond Mohn Foundation, the UKRI Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), Medical Research Council, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation, the Swedish Medical Research Council and Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.

    The findings support the University of Bristol’s research ‘Grand Challenge’ focus on Understanding and Preventing Cardiovascular Disease and builds on NIHR-funded initiatives aimed at earlier identification of people with hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors.

  • Scientists find how “zombie” cells fuel inflammation as we age

    Scientists find how “zombie” cells fuel inflammation as we age

    Inflammation is one of the immune system’s most important defenses. When the body detects an infection or injury, it sends out alarm signals that recruit immune cells and other cells to eliminate the threat and begin repairing damaged tissue.

    This response is essential, but it is supposed to shut down once the danger has passed. As people age, however, certain cells accumulate that can keep inflammation active for much longer than necessary. This persistent inflammation has been associated with numerous diseases that become more common later in life.

    Researchers at Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, Mayo Clinic, and collaborating institutions have now uncovered a previously unknown connection between mitochondria, cell metabolism, and this chronic inflammation. Their findings, published in Nature, also showed that interfering with part of the process reduced inflammation and supported healthier aging in mice.

    How “Zombie” Cells Accumulate With Age

    Many cells in the body are capable of dividing, allowing us to grow and helping tissues repair themselves after injury. But as we get older, increasing numbers of cells enter a state known as senescence. These zombie-like senescent cells stop dividing, yet they remain alive and active.

    “Senescent cells are not completely inert,” said co-corresponding author Peter Adams, PhD, the Jeanne and Gary Herberger Leadership Chair in Cancer Research at Sanford Burnham Prebys. Adams also is director of and professor in the Cancer Genome and Epigenetics Program.

    “They remain metabolically active and have an inflammatory program causing them to secrete inflammatory molecules.”

    When senescent cells activate this inflammatory program, they are described as having the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). SASP has been linked to widespread inflammation associated with aging as well as a range of chronic diseases.

    The research team, led by the laboratory of senior and co-corresponding author João Passos, PhD, a professor of Physiology at Mayo Clinic, set out to identify the molecular processes that drive SASP. Their broader goal was to determine whether those processes might be interrupted or reduced.

    “It turns out that there is a convergence of at least two biological pathways related to mitochondria,” said Adams. “One alters how DNA is stored to promote areas related to SASP, and the other boosts the expression of the exposed SASP genes.”

    Mitochondria Help Unlock Inflammatory Genes

    Although senescent cells no longer divide, they continue using energy and carrying out metabolic activity. The researchers found that their mitochondria, the structures responsible for much of a cell’s energy production, behave differently from those in healthier cells.

    In particular, mitochondria in senescent cells produced increased amounts of acetyl-CoA, an important molecule involved in metabolism.

    Acetyl-CoA also interacts with histones, spool-like proteins around which DNA is wrapped. By altering these histones, acetyl-CoA can loosen the way DNA is packaged. This does not change the genetic code itself. Instead, it makes certain genes more accessible, including genes involved in the inflammatory SASP response.

    That metabolic change alone, however, was not enough to explain why senescent cells continuously release inflammatory molecules.

    Two Mitochondrial Signals Work Together

    A second process was also required.

    Damaged mitochondria can leak DNA and RNA into parts of the cell where those molecules normally should not be present. The immune system interprets this misplaced genetic material as a danger signal, triggering an inflammatory response.

    These immune signals activate transcription factors that help switch genes on. Those factors are then able to target the SASP genes that have already been made more accessible by elevated acetyl-CoA.

    In other words, the researchers found that two separate mitochondrial processes converge. One exposes inflammatory genes, while the other provides the immune signal needed to activate them.

    “After seeing how these two independent pathways intersect, we wanted to see if interrupting one could prevent their partnership in promoting SASP,” said Adams.

    Blocking the Metabolic Signal Reduced Inflammation

    To test that possibility, the researchers used a drug called CTPI-2. The drug blocks a transport protein responsible for carrying a component needed to produce acetyl-CoA.

    When CTPI-2 was tested in mice, it reduced inflammation throughout multiple tissues. The treatment also improved tissue function and healthspan during aging.

    Importantly, the immune signals caused by leaking mitochondrial DNA and RNA were still present. But by weakening the metabolic signal involving acetyl-CoA, the researchers made SASP genes more difficult to access and reduced their inflammatory effects.

    “Even though the immune signaling from leaky mitochondria was still present, disrupting the metabolic signal made SASP genes less accessible and produced functional benefits,” said Adams. “Using selective inhibitors such as CTPI-2 to reduce acetyl-CoA and, in turn, inflammation is a novel therapeutic strategy that should be explored.

    “Also, more broadly, this research shows that targeting metabolic signals that influence DNA accessibility may represent a new approach for mitigating age-associated inflammation and functional decline.”

    The findings suggest that changing the metabolic signals controlling access to inflammatory genes could offer a new strategy for addressing chronic inflammation and declining tissue function during aging.

    Hélène Martini, PharmD, PhD, a postdoctoral researcher in the Passos lab at Mayo Clinic, is first author of the publication.

    Additional authors include:

    • Aaron Havas, Rabi Murad, Xue Lei and Rebecca A. Porritt at Sanford Burnham Prebys
    • Anthony B. Lagnado, Nicholas Pirius, Ana Catarina Franco, Gung Lee, Yeaeun Han, Jennifer L. Rowsey, Stella Victorelli, Wazim Mohammed Ismail, Amelia Mazzone, Tianna M. Espe, Taro Hitosugi, Ya Li, Alexander M. Washington, Jair Machado Espindola-Netto, Dominik Saul, Sundeep Khosla, Diana Jurk, Enis Kostallari and Alexandre Gaspar-Maia at Mayo Clinic
    • Jodie Birch at Imperial College London
    • Francisco D. M. Marques at Albert Einstein College of Medicine
    • Oliver D. K. Maddocks at the University of Glasgow

    The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Department of Defense Ovarian Cancer Research Program, Hevolution Foundation, The Glenn Foundation for Medical Research, Cancer Research UK, and Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging.

  • Ozempic and Wegovy may raise hair loss risk in some men

    Ozempic and Wegovy may raise hair loss risk in some men

    Men who are already genetically predisposed to the most common type of hair loss may face an additional 7 percent risk of losing hair when using drugs such as Ozempic, Wegovy, and Zepbound for type 2 diabetes and obesity, according to a new study.

    Researchers at NYU Langone Health examined the GLP1R gene, which naturally influences levels of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor proteins in the body. They used activity involving this gene as an indicator of GLP-1 agonist activity. Greater GLP1R activity is associated with higher levels of GLP-1 receptor proteins.

    The team compared genetic patterns associated with GLP1R activity with genes found in men who have androgenetic alopecia, the inherited form of hair loss that typically affects the top and front of the scalp. Because male hair loss has been studied far more extensively than hair loss in women, the researchers were only able to investigate a possible causal connection in men.

    Hair Loss Has Already Been Reported by GLP-1 Users

    Hair thinning has been reported by both men and women taking GLP-1 drugs. Until now, researchers have generally attributed much of that shedding to rapid weight loss, since these medications lower blood sugar and reduce appetite.

    In many cases, people taking GLP-1 drugs have reported that their hair begins growing again several months after their weight stabilizes. However, scientists have also suspected that genetics might play a role in the hair loss associated with these medications.

    The new findings, published online Sept. 3 in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology, provide evidence supporting that possibility.

    Researchers found that genetic variants associated with naturally higher levels of GLP-1 receptor proteins were more common in men with androgenetic alopecia.

    The team then adjusted its analysis to account for hypertension, a known risk factor for hair loss. High blood pressure is thought to interfere with blood flow to the scalp, potentially damaging the ability of hair follicles to grow normally. Even after accounting for hypertension, the additional 7 percent risk remained.

    Other Hair Loss Risk Factors Did Not Explain the Link

    The researchers also examined whether other conditions might account for the association, including insulin resistance (a cause of type 2 diabetes) and reduced testosterone levels.

    Neither factor explained the result. The increased hair loss risk associated with GLP-1 activity remained at 7 percent.

    Because the study examined genetic activity related both to GLP-1 use and to hair loss, the researchers say the overlapping genetic risk suggests that the two may share an underlying biological connection.

    “Our study provides the first genetic link between GLP-1 use and an increased risk of male- pattern hair loss from androgenetic alopecia, an association long suspected but until now not shown scientifically,” said study senior investigator Lynn Petukhova, PhD, an assistant professor in the Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology and the Department of Population Health at NYU Grossman School of Medicine.

    Genetic Screening Could Eventually Identify Higher Risk

    The findings could eventually help doctors identify people who may be especially vulnerable to hair loss before they begin taking GLP-1 medications.

    “Our findings suggest that, if future experiments prove successful, some men, and possibly women too, could be screened and benchmarked for their risk of hair loss before being prescribed GLP-1 medications,” said Dr. Petukhova. “We could also envision these findings leading to some GLP-1 users being prescribed combination treatments to prevent hair loss, such as minoxidil or some other drug.”

    Dr. Petukhova said more research will be necessary to determine exactly how GLP-1 activity might interfere with hair follicle growth. She also plans to investigate whether the same genetic connection found in men is present in women.

    Large Genetic Databases Provided the Evidence

    For the analysis, the researchers drew on large publicly available genetic databases. These included the eQTLGen database, which contains information from 31,684 mostly White men and women, and the Complex Traits Genetics group database, which includes 205,327 mostly White men.

    Androgenetic alopecia is estimated to affect about half of White American males over age 50. Nearly the same proportion of White American females over age 50 are affected, particularly those who are postmenopausal.

    GLP-1 medications have also become increasingly common. Surveys indicate that an estimated 12 percent of Americans have used GLP-1 drugs solely for weight loss, including one-fifth of women ages 50 to 64. Since the first GLP-1 drug (Ozempic) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2020, prescriptions for the medication have more than tripled.

    Funding support for this study was provided by National Institutes of Health grants R01AR080796 and K01AR075111.

    Besides Dr. Petukhova, NYU Langone researchers involved in the study were co-investigators Jerry Shapiro, MD, and Kristen Lo Sicco, MD. Other study co-investigators were Derek Mass, MBA; Mary Casagrande, MPH; and Poppy Gould, PhD; and co-lead investigator Archie Spindler.

    Drs. Shapiro and Lo Sicco have in the past served as study investigators for hair loss drugs and devices manufactured by Pfizer and Regen Labs. Dr. Lo Sicco is a paid consultant for Pfizer, Lilly, Ro, Priovant, Veradermics, and Aquis. The terms and conditions of all these relationships are being managed in accordance with the policies of NYU Langone.

    Additional study authors are co-lead investigator Ravi Ramesur, MD, PhD, at the University of Pennsylvania and King’s College London, and co-investigator Atlas Khan, PhD, at Columbia University.

  • Scientists discover a hidden switch that shuts down inflammation

    Scientists discover a hidden switch that shuts down inflammation

    Researchers at University College London (UCL) have identified a biological mechanism that helps the body bring inflammation to an end, a finding that could eventually lead to new treatments for chronic inflammatory diseases affecting millions of people.

    Inflammation is one of the immune system’s most important defense responses. It helps the body fight infection and repair damaged tissue. But if that response remains active for too long, it can begin to harm healthy tissue and contribute to conditions including arthritis, heart disease, and diabetes.

    Scientists have long known a great deal about how inflammation begins. What has been less clear is how the body decides that the danger has passed and shifts from fighting a threat to repairing the damage.

    A Natural Brake on the Immune System

    The new study, published in Nature Communications, points to a group of small fat-derived molecules called epoxy-oxylipins as part of that shutdown process.

    According to the researchers, these molecules act like natural brakes on the immune system. They help prevent excessive growth of intermediate monocytes,* a type of white blood cell that can support healing in the short term but may contribute to chronic inflammation if too many accumulate or remain active for too long.

    To study the process directly in people, the researchers gave healthy volunteers a tiny injection of UV-killed E. coli bacteria in the forearm. Because the bacteria were no longer alive, they could not cause an infection, but they still triggered a temporary inflammatory response.

    That reaction produced the familiar signs of inflammation, including pain, redness, heat, and swelling, similar to what can happen after an injury or infection.

    The volunteers were divided into two groups: prophylactic arm and therapeutic arm.

    Researchers then gave participants a drug called GSK2256294 at different stages of the inflammatory response. The drug blocks an enzyme known as soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH). Under normal conditions, sEH breaks down epoxy-oxylipins, so blocking the enzyme allows more of these protective molecules to remain in the body.

    • Prophylactic arm: Participants received the drug two hours before inflammation began, allowing researchers to test whether increasing epoxy-oxylipins early could prevent harmful immune changes. In this group, there were 24 volunteers — 12 were treated, 12 untreated (placebo).
    • Therapeutic arm: Participants received the drug four hours after inflammation started, better reflecting how a treatment might be used after symptoms have already appeared. In this group, there were 24 volunteers — 12 were treated, 12 untreated (placebo).

    Pain Resolved Faster and Harmful Immune Cells Fell

    Both approaches produced similar results.

    Blocking sEH increased epoxy-oxylipin levels, helped pain resolve more quickly, and sharply reduced the number of intermediate monocytes found in both the blood and tissue. These immune cells have been linked to persistent inflammation and the progression of inflammatory disease.

    The treatment did not, however, significantly change outward signs such as redness or swelling. That suggests the drug may have been altering deeper immune processes even when visible symptoms remained largely unchanged.

    The researchers then investigated how the effect worked at the molecular level.

    They found that one epoxy-oxylipin, 12,13-EpOME, appears to suppress a protein signaling pathway known as p38 MAPK. This pathway helps drive the transformation of monocytes into the intermediate form associated with prolonged inflammatory activity.

    The team confirmed the mechanism in laboratory experiments and in volunteers who received a drug that directly blocks p38.

    First author Dr. Olivia Bracken (UCL Department of Ageing, Rheumatology and Regenerative Medicine) said: “Our findings reveal a natural pathway that limits harmful immune cell expansion and helps calm inflammation more quickly.

    “Targeting this mechanism could lead to safer treatments that restore immune balance without suppressing overall immunity. With chronic inflammation ranked as a major global health threat, this discovery opens a promising avenue for new therapies.”

    A Possible Route to Safer Anti-Inflammatory Treatments

    Many existing treatments for inflammatory and autoimmune diseases work by suppressing parts of the immune system. While that can reduce inflammation, it can also interfere with the body’s ability to defend itself.

    The pathway identified in the new study may offer another strategy: strengthening a natural process the body already uses to bring inflammation under control.

    Corresponding author Professor Derek Gilroy (UCL Division of Medicine) said: “This is the first study to map epoxy-oxylipin activity in humans during inflammation.

    “By boosting these protective fat molecules, we could design safer treatments for diseases driven by chronic inflammation.”

    He added: “This was an entirely human-based study with direct relevance to autoimmune diseases, as we used a drug already suitable for human use — one that could be repurposed to treat flares in chronic inflammatory conditions, an area currently bereft of effective therapies.”

    Why Epoxy-Oxylipins Matter

    Researchers focused on epoxy-oxylipins because earlier animal studies had suggested that these molecules can reduce inflammation and pain.

    Their role in humans, however, had remained much less clear.

    Compared with better-known inflammatory substances such as histamine and cytokines, epoxy-oxylipins belong to a relatively underexplored signaling system. Scientists suspected that this pathway might help the immune system naturally transition from an active inflammatory state toward recovery.

    The new human study provides direct evidence supporting that idea.

    Next Steps

    The findings could pave the way for clinical trials testing sEH inhibitors in chronic inflammatory conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular disease.

    Dr. Bracken said: “For instance, rheumatoid arthritis is a condition in which the immune system attacks the cells that line your joints. sEH inhibitors could be trialed alongside existing medications to investigate if they can help prevent or slow down joint damage incurred by the condition.”

    Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks tissue around the joints, causing pain, swelling, stiffness, and potentially long-term damage.

    Dr. Caroline Aylott, Head of Research Delivery at Arthritis UK, said: “The pain of arthritis can affect how we move, think, sleep and feel, along with our ability to spend time with loved ones. Pain is incredibly complex and is affected by many different factors. We also know that everybody’s pain is different.

    “That is why it is important that we invest in research like this, that helps us understand what causes and influences people’s experience of pain.

    “We are excited to see the results of this study, which has found a natural process that could stop inflammation and pain. We hope in the future that this will lead to new pain management options for people with arthritis.”

    * Intermediate monocytes are white blood cells that help fight infection and repair tissue. In short bursts, they help coordinate the immune response and support recovery, but if they persist or grow in excess, they keep the immune system switched on, leading to chronic inflammation.

    The study was funded by Arthritis UK and involved researchers at UCL, King’s College London, University of Oxford, Queen Mary University of London, and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, USA.

  • Your next prescription could be treating a side effect from the last one

    Your next prescription could be treating a side effect from the last one

    A large study across Ontario has found that widely used medications, including statins and iron supplements, can sometimes trigger a chain of additional prescriptions in older adults. In these cases, a side effect from one drug may be mistaken for a new medical condition, prompting treatment with another medication.

    The research, published in BMJ, was led by Dr. Paula Rochon, Director of Research at the Weston and O’Born Center for Mature Women’s Health at Sinai Health in Toronto. The findings suggest that certain combinations of prescriptions represent a common but often overlooked source of drug-related harm across the population. They can also create avoidable costs for the healthcare system.

    When a Side Effect Leads to Another Prescription

    This pattern is known as a potentially inappropriate prescribing cascade (PIPC). It occurs when a side effect caused by one medication is interpreted as a separate health problem, leading to another prescription that may not have been necessary.

    One example identified by the researchers involves non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which are commonly used for pain. These medications are associated with increases in blood pressure. If that change is treated as a new case of high blood pressure, a patient may receive another medication instead of having the original pain treatment reconsidered.

    Older adults are particularly susceptible because they are more likely to have multiple health conditions and take several medications at the same time. With many drugs involved, it can become difficult for both clinicians and patients to determine whether a new symptom is actually being caused by an existing prescription.

    “These sequences of events are common but often missed in clinical practice,” said Dr. Rochon, who holds the Barry J. Goldlist Chair in Aging and Health at Sinai Health and is also a professor of medicine at the University of Toronto. “Knowing what medications you are taking, when they were started, and for what indication is important in order to identify possible prescribing cascades that may be problematic.”

    Researchers Identify 24 Common Prescribing Cascades

    The project involved an interdisciplinary international group of experts in medication prescribing and geriatric medicine. Collaborators came from the United States, Belgium, Italy, Israel and Ireland. The Sinai Health team included Drs. Vasily Giannakeas, Nathan Stall and Christina Reppas-Rindlisbacher, along with research staff Wei Wu and Joyce Li.

    In earlier work, the researchers drew on the expertise of 12 international panelists specializing in internal medicine, geriatric medicine and clinical pharmacology to develop a list of 65 PIPCs.

    For the new analysis, that list was compared with population-level prescription data from ICES, Ontario’s health data institute, working with Lavina Matai and Zhiyin Li. The team evaluated each possible cascade using three measures: how frequently the first medication was prescribed, how often a second medication followed it, and how strongly the two prescriptions appeared to be connected.

    That process allowed the researchers to identify 24 potentially inappropriate prescribing cascades that were both commonly observed in the population and had the potential to cause harm.

    Seeing the Pattern Behind Every Prescription

    For Dr. Rochon, the results point to an important communication gap that can develop gradually as medications accumulate.

    “Our concern is that so often these conversations between the health care prescriber and the patient are being missed, so people don’t recognize the sequences of events and that they are connected to one another,” she said.

    Addressing the problem means looking beyond a simple list of the medications a patient is currently taking. Physicians also need to consider when each drug was introduced, why it was prescribed, and whether a newer medication was added to address a symptom that might actually have been caused by an earlier treatment.

    Mature Women May Face Greater Risk

    The findings may be especially important for mature women. Over the course of their lives, women tend to experience more chronic conditions than men, receive more drug therapies, and have more adverse drug events.

    Taking multiple medications increases the opportunity for a side effect to be misinterpreted as a separate diagnosis. As a result, another drug may be added instead of tracing the symptom back to the medication that caused it.

    Technology Could Help Catch Drug Cascades

    The researchers say technology could provide one way to reduce these potentially harmful prescribing patterns.

    Automated clinical decision support systems could be designed to recognize a possible prescribing cascade as it develops. Such systems might alert clinicians when a new medication appears to be treating a known side effect of an existing drug, giving them an opportunity to reconsider the treatment plan before adding another prescription.

    This information could be incorporated into several types of automated tools that alert clinicians to potentially inappropriate prescribing cascades at the point of care.

    Pharmacists Could Play a Larger Role

    The researchers also see an opportunity to make greater use of pharmacists as part of the healthcare team.

    More directly involving pharmacists in prescribing decisions alongside physicians could help uncover medication patterns that might otherwise go unnoticed. Their expertise could help identify potentially inappropriate prescribing cascades that warrant further evaluation.

  • One sugary drink a day linked to more than double the risk of stomach cancer

    One sugary drink a day linked to more than double the risk of stomach cancer

    About 65% of U.S. adults report drinking at least one sugar-sweetened beverage each day. New research from the Mass General Brigham Cancer Institute suggests that this common habit may be associated with a higher risk of gastric cancer.

    The researchers found that people who consumed sugar-sweetened beverages every day were more likely to develop gastric cancer than those who rarely drank them. Artificially sweetened beverages, however, were not linked to an increased risk. The findings were published in the journal Gastro Hep Advances.

    A Long-Term Look at Sugary Drinks and Cancer

    Earlier research has connected sugar-sweetened beverages with higher risks of colorectal, breast, and liver cancers. Until now, however, relatively little was known about whether these drinks might also be associated with gastric cancer.

    To investigate, researchers examined data from 112,284 participants enrolled in the Nurses’ Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-Up Study. These long-running studies collected detailed information about participants’ diets, lifestyles, and health over several decades. During the follow-up period, which also extended across decades, 278 participants developed gastric cancer.

    “This is the first study to demonstrate an association between sugar-sweetened beverage intake and gastric cancer in a U.S. population,” said senior author Andrew T. Chan, MD, MPH, a gastroenterologist and epidemiologist with the Mass General Brigham Cancer Institute. “Gastric cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer death worldwide, but we’ve known very little about how diet might contribute to this cancer.”

    Daily Sugary Drinks Linked to 2.45 Times Higher Risk

    After the researchers adjusted for other factors that could influence gastric cancer risk, they found a striking difference between frequent and infrequent consumers.

    Participants who drank at least one serving of a sugar-sweetened beverage each day had a 2.45 times higher risk of developing gastric cancer than participants who consumed less than one serving per month. The association appeared in both women and men.

    Higher overall fructose consumption (fructose is the main sweetener in these drinks) was also associated with a greater incidence of gastric cancer.

    Among women in the Nurses’ Health Study, for example, consuming more than one sugar-sweetened beverage per day was associated with a 3.04-fold higher risk of gastric cancer compared with women who very rarely consumed these beverages.

    The pattern was different for artificially sweetened drinks. After researchers accounted for other potential factors, greater consumption of artificially sweetened beverages was not associated with a higher incidence of gastric cancer.

    For the study, sugar-sweetened beverages included carbonated beverages, punch, lemonade and sports drinks. Artificially sweetened beverages were defined as low-calorie carbonated beverages.

    Researchers Examined H. pylori Infection

    The researchers also explored whether Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) might help explain the findings. Infection with this bacterium is a known risk factor for gastric cancer.

    H. pylori status was available for a subset of 940 participants. Slightly more than one third showed evidence of infection, but the researchers found no association between sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and H. pylori infection.

    Why the Findings Do Not Prove Cause and Effect

    The researchers cautioned that the study was observational, meaning it can identify associations but cannot establish that sugar-sweetened beverages directly cause gastric cancer.

    Other factors could have contributed to the higher cancer rates seen among people who consumed more sugary beverages. The researchers also had limited information about participants’ H. pylori status and family histories of gastric cancer.

    Another limitation was the study population. Participants were predominantly white, making it difficult to determine whether the association differs across racial and ethnic groups.

    At the same time, the study included a large number of participants and drew on detailed health, diet, and lifestyle information collected over many years. This allowed researchers to account for many other possible risk factors for gastric cancer.

    Further research will be needed to confirm the results and determine why sugar-sweetened beverages might be associated with a greater risk of gastric cancer.

    Authorship: In addition to Chan, Mass General Brigham authors include Tae-Geun Gweon, Jane Ha, Hanseul Kim, Mengxi Du, and Mingyang Song.

    Funding: This work was supported by R35 CA253185, U01 CA261961, R01CA263776, and a Stand Up to Cancer Gastric Cancer Interception Dream Team award.

    Disclosures: Chan served as a consultant for Pfizer Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim and received grant support from Freenome Holdings outside the submitted work.