Category: bacteria

  • Your gut bacteria could be changing how many calories you absorb

    Your gut bacteria could be changing how many calories you absorb

    The calorie count printed on a food package might seem like a straightforward measure of how much energy you will get from eating it. But the number on the label does not necessarily match the calories your body actually absorbs. One reason is that digestion involves more than just breaking down food. It also depends on trillions of microorganisms living inside your digestive system.

    Researchers at Arizona State University have developed a mathematical model that explores this often overlooked part of digestion. Known as DAMM, short for digestion, absorption and microbial metabolism, the model tracks how food moves through the digestive tract, how much energy the body absorbs directly, and how gut microbes process whatever remains. It also estimates which products of digestion are absorbed and which leave the body as waste.

    By accounting for the relationship between diet, human digestion, and gut bacteria, the researchers hope to improve our understanding of obesity, diabetes, and other metabolic disorders. With further development, the approach could eventually help health care professionals create diets tailored to individual patients.

    “Digestion is not just a human process — it is a collaboration between our bodies and trillions of microbes living in the gut,” said Professor Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown. “DAMM gives us a powerful new way to quantify how those microbial partners contribute to human health and energy balance, and also point at the importance of properly feeding our gut microbes.”

    Krajmalnik-Brown is director of ASU’s Biodesign Center for Health Through Microbiomes and a professor in the university’s School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment.

    The research team also included ASU Professor Bruce Rittmann, director of the Biodesign Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology and a Regents Professor of environmental engineering, along with first author Taylor Davis, an ASU graduate research assistant. Scientists at the AdventHealth Translational Research Institute in Orlando, Florida, collaborated on the project.

    The findings were published in PLOS One.

    Why Traditional Calorie Counts Miss Part of the Picture

    For more than 100 years, scientists have used a system based on Atwater parameters to estimate how much energy people can obtain from food. This method assigns average calorie values to each gram of fat, carbohydrates, and protein, then uses those values to calculate the total available energy.

    Although this approach is practical and widely used, it cannot fully explain what happens during digestion. In particular, it does not account for how different foods nourish gut bacteria or how those bacteria transform undigested material into substances the body can use for energy.

    One important example involves short-chain fatty acids. These compounds are produced when microbes in the colon break down fiber and other food components that pass through the upper digestive tract without being absorbed. Some of these fatty acids can enter the bloodstream and provide additional calories.

    To better understand these interactions, the researchers built on an earlier controlled diet study investigating how the gut microbiome influences human energy balance. The gut microbiome consists of the enormous community of bacteria and other microorganisms that inhabit the digestive system.

    A High-Fiber Diet Led to 116 Fewer Calories Absorbed Per Day

    In the clinical study, healthy adults followed one of two carefully designed eating plans. The first was a microbiome-enhancer diet containing substantial amounts of fiber and resistant starch (less processed foods and foods with larger particle size). Resistant starch is a type of carbohydrate that escapes much of the usual digestion in the small intestine, allowing it to reach the colon, where microbes can break it down.

    The second eating plan resembled a typical Western diet, with lower amounts of fiber and resistant starch (more processed foods and smaller particle size).

    Despite both diets being designed for the study, participants absorbed noticeably different amounts of energy. Those consuming the Western diet absorbed approximately 116 more calories per day than those eating the fiber-rich diet.

    Perhaps just as interesting, the people following the higher-fiber eating plan did not report feeling hungrier.

    The findings suggest that the amount of energy people obtain from food depends partly on its composition and how it moves through the digestive system. Differences in food processing, fiber content, and microbial activity can all influence the final outcome.

    “What is truly unique about the DAMM model is that it quantitatively links human metabolism to the metabolism of the microorganisms in the colon in a way that matches the results from the clinical study and provides fundamental insight into how the microbial community works in partnership with the human host,” Rittmann said.

    Gut Bacteria Can Supply About 140 Calories a Day

    The DAMM model offers a more detailed way to follow the energy contained in food from the moment it enters the digestive system.

    First, it examines the protein, carbohydrate, and fat content of a person’s diet and estimates how much usable energy is absorbed in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

    It then tracks the remaining material as it moves into the colon. Here, gut microbes break down nutrients that escaped earlier digestion, producing compounds such as short-chain fatty acids. The body can absorb some of these compounds through the colon and use them as another source of energy.

    The model also includes methane production by certain microorganisms called methanogens, which generate methane as part of their metabolism.

    According to the researchers’ calculations, short-chain fatty acids absorbed from the colon supplied an average of approximately 140 calories per day. That represents about 7.4% of the total usable energy obtained from food.

    More broadly, the model estimated that roughly 85% of usable energy came from the upper gastrointestinal tract, while approximately 15% came from the lower gastrointestinal tract, where microbes are especially important.

    These findings highlight why traditional calorie calculations cannot fully describe human digestion. A meaningful share of the energy available to the body is influenced by microbial processes that conventional food-label calculations do not explicitly measure.

    When the team compared DAMM’s predictions with actual measurements from the controlled diet study, the model produced estimates that were closer to the observed calorie absorption than those generated using the conventional Atwater approach.

    The older method generally underestimated how many calories participants absorbed. By including microbial metabolism, DAMM provided a more accurate estimate of the energy obtained from the different diets.

    How Fiber Changes the Calorie Equation

    One of the model’s most revealing features is its ability to account for differences between diets.

    The microbiome-enhancer diet delivered more fiber and other fermentable material to the colon. This gave gut microbes additional substances to break down, increasing their production of short-chain fatty acids.

    DAMM predicted this increase, consistent with the pattern observed in the controlled clinical trial. Participants consuming the microbiome-enhancer diet had higher levels of short-chain fatty acids in measurements taken from their blood serum and feces.

    These compounds are important because they illustrate how closely microbial activity and human metabolism are connected. Gut bacteria can transform food components that would otherwise pass through the digestive system into molecules that the body can absorb and use for energy.

    However, producing more of these compounds does not necessarily mean absorbing more calories overall.

    In fact, participants following the microbiome-enhancer diet absorbed fewer net calories than those eating the Western diet, even though the higher-fiber diet supported greater microbial activity and increased short-chain fatty acid production.

    This apparent contradiction becomes easier to understand when the different stages of digestion are examined separately. Although gut microbes can generate additional usable energy, the amount absorbed directly from food in the upper digestive tract also matters.

    DAMM helps researchers distinguish between these contributions. It estimates how much energy the body extracts before food reaches the colon, how much energy microbes produce from the remaining material, and how much ultimately gets absorbed or eliminated.

    Toward More Personalized Diets and Better Nutrition

    By bringing human digestion and microbial metabolism into a single mathematical framework, the researchers have created a tool that could help explain why different diets produce different effects on the body’s energy balance.

    The approach may eventually improve scientists’ understanding of how diet influences obesity, diabetes, and other metabolic conditions. It also raises the possibility of designing nutrition plans that consider not only the nutrients in food but also how those nutrients interact with the microbes living inside each person’s gut.

    For now, the model provides a research framework rather than a ready-to-use method for prescribing personalized diets. Further studies will be needed to determine how well it performs across different populations, eating patterns, and microbiome compositions.

    The researchers also expect the model to become more sophisticated as scientists uncover additional details about how microorganisms and the human body exchange nutrients and energy.

    “The DAMM model is more than just a tool for characterizing diet,” Davis said. “It’s a framework designed to evolve. As we discover more on how diet, metabolism and the microbes interact, the new insights can be incorporated into the model, allowing it to grow with us as we learn.”

  • Gut bacteria may unlock a hidden benefit of vegetables

    Gut bacteria may unlock a hidden benefit of vegetables

    Researchers at Karolinska Institutet have found that gut microbes can transform nitrate and iron from food into molecules that may help protect against cardiovascular and metabolic disease. The findings, published in Cell, uncover a previously unknown way the gut microbiota may influence important functions throughout the body.

    Nitrate is found naturally in many vegetables, especially beetroot and leafy greens such as spinach, rocket, and lettuce. Non-haem iron — the form of iron found in plant-based foods such as beans, whole grains and green vegetables — is also a common part of the diet.

    The researchers found that gut bacteria can combine nitrate and non-haem iron from food to produce compounds known as dinitrosyl iron complexes (DNICs). After they are formed, these molecules can be absorbed into the body and carried to different organs, particularly the liver and kidneys.

    Gut Microbes Are Essential for DNIC Formation

    The study drew on experiments involving mice, cells, bacteria and human samples. Using advanced analytical techniques, the researchers detected DNIC in several types of tissue.

    They also found that DNIC molecules were completely absent in germ-free mice. That result suggests that gut microbes play an essential role in producing them.

    “Our results show that gut bacteria can convert components in food into biologically active molecules that influence important bodily functions,” says Andrei L. Kleschyov, Senior Researcher at the Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, the study’s first and co-corresponding author.

    Higher DNIC Levels Improved Key Health Markers

    The researchers then tested what happened when DNIC levels were increased. They did this either by giving dietary supplements containing nitrate and iron or by administering synthetically produced DNIC.

    In an animal model of cardiovascular and metabolic disease, higher DNIC levels were associated with improvements in several measures of health.

    “Among other things, we observed lower blood pressure and improved vascular function, better blood sugar control and reduced fat accumulation in the liver. The results help to explain why a diet rich in vegetables, which contain both nitrate and iron, is linked to a lower risk of several diseases,” says Mattias Carlström, Professor of Cardiorenal Physiology at the Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, one of the study’s shared last authors together with Professor Jon Lundberg at the same department, and co-corresponding author.

    A Possible Link Between Vegetables and Disease Protection

    According to the researchers, the results reveal a previously unknown mechanism through which diet and specific gut bacteria may work together to support health.

    The findings could also help explain why diets rich in vegetables are associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. However, the researchers caution that much of the work was carried out in experimental models, so additional research will be necessary to determine exactly how the process operates in humans.

    Researchers Now Want to Study DNIC in Humans

    The next goal is to develop reliable ways to measure DNIC levels in people. Researchers also want to learn more about how the molecules are produced, how they move through the body, and how they influence different physiological processes.

    Another major question is whether diet or changes to the gut microbiota could be used to alter DNIC levels and potentially help prevent disease.

    The study was carried out in collaboration with the University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf and the Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Centre Mainz in Germany. The research was funded by, amongst others, the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the European Research Council (ERC), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Diabetes Wellness Sweden and the Karolinska Institute. The researchers state that they have no conflicts of interest.

  • how bacteria ‘vaccinate’ themselves with genetic material from dormant viruses

    how bacteria ‘vaccinate’ themselves with genetic material from dormant viruses

    Like people, bacteria get invaded by viruses. In bacteria, the viral invaders are called bacteriophages, derived from the Greek word for bacteria-eaters, or in shortened form, “phages.” Scientists have sought to learn how the single-cell organisms survive phage infection in a bid to further understand human immunity and develop ways to combat diseases.

    Now, Johns Hopkins Medicine scientists say they have shed new light on how bacteria protect themselves from certain phage invaders — by seizing genetic material from weakened, dormant phages and using it to “vaccinate” themselves to elicit an immune response.

    In their experiments, the scientists say Streptococcus pyogenes bacteria (which cause strep throat) take advantage of a class of phages known as temperate phages, which can either kill cells or become dormant. The bacteria steal genetic material from temperate phages during this dormant period and form a biological “memory” of the invader that their offspring inherit as the bacteria multiply. Equipped with these memories, the new population can recognize these viruses and fight them off.

    A report on the experiments, supported in part by the National Institutes of Health, was published March 12 in the journal Cell Host & Microbe. The findings help scientists better understand how bacterial cells that cause serious diseases, including Staph and E. coli infections and cholera, become toxic to humans — a process that involves toxic genes expressed by otherwise dormant phages that reside within the bacterial cell, says corresponding author Joshua Modell, Ph.D., associate professor of molecular biology and genetics at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

    “We essentially wanted to answer the question: If bacterial cells don’t have any memory, or survival skills, to combat a new temperate phage that shows up, how do they buy themselves enough time to establish a new memory, before they succumb to that initial infection?” says Modell.

    The Johns Hopkins investigators say bacteria have long been known to use CRISPR-Cas systems to chop up phage DNA, break it down and get rid of it. Crucially, CRISPR systems can only destroy DNA that matches a “memory” captured from a prior infection and stored within the bacteria’s own genome, say the researchers. In this way, the CRISPR system acts as a recording device that documents the long list of foreign invaders encountered by a particular bacterial strain.

    To conduct their research, the scientists say they infected populations of bacteria with naturally occurring phages that go dormant or genetically engineered non-dormant phages in separate flasks that contained millions of bacterial cells.

    “Our results indicate that the bacteria’s CRISPR system was more effective at using the naturally dormant phage to pull parts of the viral genetic code into their genome,” says Modell. “When we tested phages that could not go dormant, the CRISPR system did not work nearly as well.”

    After isolating the bacteria that survived, and letting the survivors repopulate the flask, the scientists used genome sequencing to catalog hundreds of thousands of new DNA memories that the CRISPR Cas9 system had created from the test phages, honing in on those that contribute to cell immunity. The scientists also determined that bacteria created those memories during the temperate phage’s dormancy period, when it did not pose a threat to the population.

    “This is conceptually similar to a vaccine with an attenuated virus,” says Nicholas Keith, a graduate student and first author of the paper. “We believe this is the reason why the CRISPR Cas9 system has a unique relationship with this specific class of temperate phage.”

    “We can use these types of experiments to find what elements of the phage, the bacterial host and its CRISPR system are important for all stages of bacterial immunity,” Keith says.

    In future experiments, the scientists aim to learn more about how CRISPR systems protect bacteria cells from viruses that don’t go dormant, Modell says.

    “We know CRISPR systems are one of the first lines of defense against the transfer of hazardous genes from phages that turn bacterial cells toxic,” says Modell. “Furthermore, our studies will inform the design of ‘phage therapies’ which could be used in clinical cases where a bacterial infection is resistant to all available antibiotics.”

    In addition to Keith and Modell, study contributors are Rhett Snyder from Johns Hopkins and Chad Euler from Hunter College.

    The research was funded by the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, the National Institutes of Health National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM142731), the Rita Allen Foundation and the National Science Foundation.